Editorial standards

What we write vs. what we aggregate

There are two very different kinds of content on this site, and we keep the line between them clear.

• Written by our team: the career guides, interview-question breakdowns, sample answers, and FAQs. These are researched, written, and reviewed by people — not published straight from a model.
• Aggregated, not written: the job listings themselves. Every role on the board originates from a third-party source; our editorial team does not write or author job postings. You can read exactly how that works on how we source jobs.

How we research and keep content current

Career and interview guidance is grounded in how PM hiring actually works across the market, and we update pages periodically as processes and norms shift. Compensation ranges are drawn from public compensation data and refreshed over time rather than set once and forgotten. Where we use AI tools to help draft or structure content, the output is reviewed and edited by a person before it's published — we don't ship unreviewed, machine-generated pages.

How we treat compensation figures

Salary and total-compensation numbers on this site are directional ranges, not guarantees. Pay varies widely by company, tier, level, location, and market, and any figure we give is meant to orient you, not to promise an offer. We present these as ranges precisely because a single number would be misleading. Treat them as a starting point for your own research, and verify specifics against an employer's actual offer.

Corrections

If something reads as inaccurate or out of date — a guide, a figure, or a listing that looks wrong — tell us. We'd rather fix it than leave it. Reach the team via the contact page.